UNCERTAINTY ABOUT ESTATE TAX: WILL IT DISAPPEAR? A history lesson.
In our last newsletter, we outlined some of the highlights of the temporary extension of the estate tax that will be effective from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012. What will happen next? Is the estate tax likely to disappear or even remain “as is” with lower rates and a more generous personal exemption than at most any time in history? Well, let’s take a look at the history of this tax.
American governments have taxed estates, at least on a temporary basis, since the founding of this country. The first estate duty was imposed by the Federalists to finance an undeclared war with France. Abraham Lincoln imposed a temporary inheritance tax during the civil war. A third, temporary estate tax was enacted to fund the Spanish-American War. Then, in 1916, the current estate tax law was enacted and has remained in existence ever since.
Who were the champions of the idea of an estate tax in the early part of the 20th Century? It was a Republican President, Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt (“TR”), who was the modern champion of the estate tax. In 1910 TR stated: “We grudge no man a fortune in civil life if it is honorably obtained and well used.”… “We should permit it to be gained only so long as the gaining represents benefit to the community…” The really big fortune, the swollen fortune, by the mere fact of its size, acquires qualities which differentiate it in kind as well as in degree from what is possessed of men of relatively small means. Therefore, I believe in a graduated income tax on big fortunes, and … a graduated inheritance tax on big fortunes, properly safeguarded against evasion, and increasing rapidly in amount with the size of the estate.”
TR was not alone in advocating for an estate tax. Supreme Court Justice, Louis Brandeis, said, “We can have concentrated wealth in the hands of a few or we can have democracy, but we can’t have both.” Even one of the nation’s wealthiest men at the time, Andrew Carnegie, testified in Congress in favor of an estate tax as the best way to address wealth concentration. So, the estate tax never was intended to be solely a device for raising revenue for the federal government. Rather, it was meant to address the phenomenon of a small number of Americans controlling large amounts of the country’s wealth, which was considered a national problem at the beginning of the 20th Century. This period has been referred to as the “Gilded Age”.
When the estate tax was enacted in 1916, the richest 1% of Americans owned more than 50% of the country’s wealth. By 1976, the amount of the nation’s wealth controlled by the richest 1% had fallen to only 20%. Over that time, this greater disbursement of wealth fostered growth of a strong middle class. However, the tax policies of the last 35 years have reversed the trend. Today, the wealthiest 1% own more than 33% of the country’s wealth.
So, has the estate tax accomplished the goals of its supporters? Is it a necessary component of our democracy? Only time will tell how the political debate over the estate tax plays out.
